[Python-Dev] PEP 428 - pathlib
[Python-Dev] PEP 428 - pathlib - ready for approval
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rodola at gmail.comWed Nov 20 22:39:43 CET 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 428 - pathlib - ready for approval
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 428 - pathlib - ready for approval
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net>wrote: > > Hello, > > Guido has told me that he was ready to approve PEP 428 (pathlib) in its > latest amended form. Here is the last call for any comments or > arguments against approval, before Guido marks the PEP accepted (or > changes his mind :-)). > > Regards > > Antoine. > Isn't this redundant? >>> Path.cwd() PosixPath('/home/antoine/pathlib') Probably this is just personal taste but I'd prefer the more explicit: >>> Path(os.getcwd()) PosixPath('/home/antoine/pathlib') I understand all the os.* replication (Path.rename, Path.stat etc.) but all these methods assume you're dealing with an instantiated Path instance whereas Path.cwd is the only one which doesn't. Not a big deal anyway, it just catched my eye because it's different. Other than that the module looks absolutely awesome and a big improvement over os.path! --- Giampaolo https://code.google.com/p/pyftpdlib/ https://code.google.com/p/psutil/ https://code.google.com/p/pysendfile/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20131120/495b8c75/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 428 - pathlib - ready for approval
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 428 - pathlib - ready for approval
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list