[Python-Dev] PEP 428 - pathlib API questions
Ben Hoyt
benhoyt at gmail.com
Mon Nov 25 00:42:08 CET 2013
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Nov 25 00:42:08 CET 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 428 - pathlib API questions
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 428 - pathlib API questions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Using "**" for directory spanning globs is also another case of us borrowing > a reasonably common idiom from *nix systems that may not be familiar to > Windows users. Okay, *nix wins then. :-) Python's stdlib is already fairly *nix-oriented (even when it's being cross-platform), so I guess it's not a big deal. My only remaining concern then is that there shouldn't be more than one way to do recursive globbing in a new API like this. Why does rglob() exist when the documentation simply says "like calling glob() but with '**' added in front of the pattern"? http://docs.python.org/dev/library/pathlib.html#pathlib.Path.rglob -Ben
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 428 - pathlib API questions
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 428 - pathlib API questions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list