Home Original page

[Python-Dev] PEP process entry point and ill fated initiatives

Steven D'Aprano steve at pearwood.info
Sat Nov 30 00:00:59 CET 2013 
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 03:25:14PM +0000, Kristján Valur Jónsson wrote 
about the PEP process:

> > > How about acknowledging that these waters are dark and murky and help
> > > making things better?
> > 
> > Well, how about? If Anatoly has a concrete proposal, surely he can propose a
> > patch to make things better.
>
> Which is what  he did.  And instead of helpful ideas on how to improve his patch,
> the issue is closed.  The acolytes have spoken.

As the first-time author of a PEP (450), I did not find that the waters 
were dark and murky, and I certainly did not feel that the "acolytes" 
tried to shut me out, or shut themselves in as you suggest.

Nobody held my hand through the process of writing the PEP, but people 
pointed me in the right direction and were tolerant of my newbie 
mistakes. The PEP process is quite well documented in the PEPs 
themselves, for somebody who is willing to do a bit of reading.

Could the process be more clear? Could the existing docs be improved? Of 
course the answers to these questions are Yes, nothing is perfect. But 
overall, I found the PEP process to be less painful than I had feared.


-- 
Steven
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list