[Python-Dev] cpython: Issue #18582: provide a faster C implementation of pbkdf2_hmac that works with
Christian Heimes
christian at python.org
Sat Oct 19 15:36:02 CEST 2013
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Oct 19 15:36:02 CEST 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] cpython: Issue #18582: provide a faster C implementation of pbkdf2_hmac that works with
- Next message: [Python-Dev] cpython: Issue #18582: provide a faster C implementation of pbkdf2_hmac that works with
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Am 19.10.2013 14:54, schrieb Antoine Pitrou: > On Sat, 19 Oct 2013 14:25:28 +0200 (CEST) > christian.heimes <python-checkins at python.org> wrote: >> >> - .. note:: A fast implementation of *pbkdf2_hmac* is only available with >> - OpenSSL 1.0 and newer. The Python implementation uses an inline >> - version of :mod:`hmac` and is about three times slower. Contrary to >> - OpenSSL's current code the length of the password has only a minimal >> - impact on the runtime of the Python implementation. >> + .. note:: A fast implementation of *pbkdf2_hmac* is available with OpenSSL. >> + The Python implementation uses an inline version of :mod:`hmac`. It is >> + about three times slower and doesn't release the GIL. > > The documentation should stop talking about the Python implementation > if the C implementation is always used by default. The C implementation is not used if Python is not compiled with OpenSSL support.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] cpython: Issue #18582: provide a faster C implementation of pbkdf2_hmac that works with
- Next message: [Python-Dev] cpython: Issue #18582: provide a faster C implementation of pbkdf2_hmac that works with
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list