[Python-Dev] cpython: Issue #18582: provide a faster C implementation of pbkdf2_hmac that works with
Antoine Pitrou
solipsis at pitrou.net
Sat Oct 19 18:28:10 CEST 2013
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Oct 19 18:28:10 CEST 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] cpython: Issue #18582: provide a faster C implementation of pbkdf2_hmac that works with
- Next message: [Python-Dev] cpython: Issue #18582: provide a faster C implementation of pbkdf2_hmac that works with
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013 18:05:35 +0200 Christian Heimes <christian at python.org> wrote: > Am 19.10.2013 16:59, schrieb Antoine Pitrou: > > But that's a fringe situation. Any normal build of Python should be > > compiled with OpenSSL support (and any decent binary build is). I think > > the mention in the docs is distracting and will create pointless > > uncertainty in the reader. > > HMAC_CTX_copy() is not available in OpenSSL < 1.0. My optimized code > won't run on OpenSSL 0.9.8. IMHO it's important to understand that some > code may complete in ~100ms instead of ~30ms. Well, I disagree about the importance of documenting a 3x difference on a select function (rather than, say, a couple orders of magnitude), but the OpenSSL version issue at least makes the situation more plausible :-) (even though OpenSSL 1.0 is already 3.5 years old) Regards Antoine.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] cpython: Issue #18582: provide a faster C implementation of pbkdf2_hmac that works with
- Next message: [Python-Dev] cpython: Issue #18582: provide a faster C implementation of pbkdf2_hmac that works with
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list