[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Issue #19330: Handle the no-docstrings case in tests
Stefan Krah
stefan-usenet at bytereef.org
Sat Oct 26 14:50:01 CEST 2013
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Oct 26 14:50:01 CEST 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Fiddled Thread.join() to be a little simpler. Kinda ; -)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Issue #19330: Handle the no-docstrings case in tests
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
nick.coghlan <python-checkins at python.org> wrote: > http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/a9bbc2d0c1dc > -HAVE_DOCSTRINGS = (check_impl_detail(cpython=False) or > - sys.platform == 'win32' or > - sysconfig.get_config_var('WITH_DOC_STRINGS')) > +# Rather than trying to enumerate all the cases where docstrings may be > +# disabled, we just check for that directly > + > +def _check_docstrings(): > + """Just used to check if docstrings are enabled""" > + > +HAVE_DOCSTRINGS = (_check_docstrings.__doc__ is not None) > > requires_docstrings = unittest.skipUnless(HAVE_DOCSTRINGS, I think that does not detect --without-doc-strings (i.e. the C docstrings are empty). Stefan Krah
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Fiddled Thread.join() to be a little simpler. Kinda ; -)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Issue #19330: Handle the no-docstrings case in tests
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list