[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Fiddled Thread.join() to be a little simpler. Kinda ; -)
Tim Peters
tim.peters at gmail.com
Sat Oct 26 17:42:27 CEST 2013
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Oct 26 17:42:27 CEST 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Fiddled Thread.join() to be a little simpler. Kinda ; -)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Fiddled Thread.join() to be a little simpler. Kinda ; -)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 6:29 AM, A.M. Kuchling <amk at amk.ca> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 05:34:05AM +0200, tim.peters wrote: >> Fiddled Thread.join() to be a little simpler. Kinda ;-) >> - # else it's a negative timeout - precise behavior isn't documented >> - # then, but historically .join() returned in this case >> + else: >> + # the behavior of a negative timeout isn't documented, but >> + # historically .join() has acted as if timeout=0 then > > I think the final 'then' on the new comment is an editing error. > Unless perhaps you meant to write a further sentence of comment? Reads OK to me. Read "then" as an abbreviation of "in that case"?
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Fiddled Thread.join() to be a little simpler. Kinda ; -)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Fiddled Thread.join() to be a little simpler. Kinda ; -)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list