[Python-Dev] PEP 447: add type.__locallookup__
Mark Shannon
mark at hotpy.org
Tue Sep 10 00:36:15 CEST 2013
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Sep 10 00:36:15 CEST 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 447: add type.__locallookup__
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 447: add type.__locallookup__
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 09/09/13 22:25, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > 2013/9/9 Mark Shannon <mark at hotpy.org>: >> On 09/09/13 15:30, Ethan Furman wrote: >>> >>> On 07/30/2013 11:17 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> And something I forgot to ask: is anyone willing to be the >>>> BDFL-Delegate for >>>> PEP 447? >>> >>> >>> *Bump*. >>> >>> It would be nice if this could make into 3.4. >>> >> >> IMO, there are some issues that need to be addressed before PEP 447 should >> be accepted. >> >> 1. Is there even a problem at all, or is this just a bug in super? >> Why doesn't super() respect the __getattribute__ method of the superclass? > > You want to be looking things up on the class, not an instance. > Sorry, I meant 'type of the superclass' rather than 'superclass'. I was suggesting that super().m should be type(type(self).__mro__[1]).__getattribute__('m') rather than type(self).__mro__[1].__dict__['m'] (ignoring descriptor __get__ calls) Unfortunately this brings its own problems, due to __getattribute__ doing its own traversal of the mro. So, scratch point 1. Cheers, Mark.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 447: add type.__locallookup__
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 447: add type.__locallookup__
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list