[Python-Dev] Revert #12085 fix for __del__ attribute error message
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Tue Sep 24 09:32:15 CEST 2013
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Sep 24 09:32:15 CEST 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Revert #12085 fix for __del__ attribute error message
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Revert #12085 fix for __del__ attribute error message
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 24 September 2013 17:25, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > Preferring the status quo because > you're holding out a forlorn hope for a concise wording that explains: > > - there are places where exceptions may occur but the interpreter > can't reraise them > - this is one of those cases, so we're printing it to stderr instead > > *without users needing to do any research*. Oops, reworded the second part of that sentence without fixing the first part. It should have said: ============== It doesn't make sense to prefer the status quo because you're holding out a forlorn hope for a concise wording that explains: - there are places where exceptions may occur but the interpreter can't reraise them - this is one of those cases, so we're printing it to stderr instead *without users needing to do any research*. ============== Regards, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Revert #12085 fix for __del__ attribute error message
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Revert #12085 fix for __del__ attribute error message
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list