[Python-Dev] PEP 453 (pip bootstrapping) ready for pronouncement?
Donald Stufft
donald at stufft.io
Thu Sep 26 01:08:32 CEST 2013
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Sep 26 01:08:32 CEST 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 453 (pip bootstrapping) ready for pronouncement?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 453 (pip bootstrapping) ready for pronouncement?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sep 25, 2013, at 7:04 PM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: > So, why shouldn't we add enum to the Python 2.7 stdlib? Or any other new > feature? Just be aware that if this PEP is accepted for Python 2.7, the bar > will be set much lower for other Really Useful Features That Make Users Lives > Better. Because with PEP453 you can just ``pip install enum34`` it :) ----------------- Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130925/53fd5d4a/attachment.sig>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 453 (pip bootstrapping) ready for pronouncement?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 453 (pip bootstrapping) ready for pronouncement?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list