Simon Cross hodgestar+pythondev at gmail.com
Mon Sep 30 09:05:11 CEST 2013

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Getting Tulip (PEP 3156) into the 3.4 stdlib, marked provisional, named asyncio
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 453 (pip bootstrap) TL;DR and Usage Scenario
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org> wrote:
> My guess is, a lot of people would be disappointed if Tulip missed 3.4.  I
> suspect the community would rather we slip the beta a little if it meant it
> the difference between Tulip and no Tulip.

+1

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Getting Tulip (PEP 3156) into the 3.4 stdlib, marked provisional, named asyncio
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 453 (pip bootstrap) TL;DR and Usage Scenario
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list