[Python-Dev] PEP 465: A dedicated infix operator for matrix multiplication
Benjamin Peterson
benjamin at python.org
Mon Apr 7 23:34:32 CEST 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Apr 7 23:34:32 CEST 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 465: A dedicated infix operator for matrix multiplication
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 465: A dedicated infix operator for matrix multiplication
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014, at 14:33, Alexander Belopolsky wrote: > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Benjamin Peterson > <benjamin at python.org>wrote: > > > I can understand why creating new array types is good fun, but how is > > creating a new struct helpful? > > > > We can start by reviewing the reasons for having separate > PyNumber/PySequence/PyMappingMethods > structures. I believe that one of the reasons is that many types need to > allocate only one of the three. Numpy arrays, IIRC, allocate all three. > A > dedicated PyArrayMethods struct can replace some if not all of these > allocations. I can't say it seems like a terrible important thing to optimize to me.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 465: A dedicated infix operator for matrix multiplication
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 465: A dedicated infix operator for matrix multiplication
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list