[Python-Dev] death to 2.7; long live 2.7
Senthil Kumaran
senthil at uthcode.com
Thu Apr 10 04:09:51 CEST 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Apr 10 04:09:51 CEST 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] death to 2.7; long live 2.7
- Next message: [Python-Dev] death to 2.7; long live 2.7
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org>wrote: > I consider the security enhancement/feature question to be in the domain > of PEP 466. If security stuff lands in the 2.7 branch, it will get > released eventually is all I'm saying. > Thanks for the response. >> Instead dealing 2.7 will just be completely optional for core developers I was worried about this part, that if bug-fixes are optionally back-ported, then we may end up a inconsistent, undesirable state. Instead it could be that bug-fixes fixes will be back-ported as long as it is alive (and folks seem be excited about keep it alive for a long long term). -- Senthil -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140409/47bdf83f/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] death to 2.7; long live 2.7
- Next message: [Python-Dev] death to 2.7; long live 2.7
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list