[Python-Dev] this is what happens if you freeze all the modules required for startup
Brett Cannon
brett at python.org
Tue Apr 15 00:18:40 CEST 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Apr 15 00:18:40 CEST 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] this is what happens if you freeze all the modules required for startup
- Next message: [Python-Dev] this is what happens if you freeze all the modules required for startup
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Glenn Linderman <v+python at g.nevcal.com>wrote: > On 4/14/2014 2:51 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > > consider freezing all the modules > > ... > > Now the question is whether the maintenance cost of having to rebuild > Python for a select number of stdlib modules > > > "all" versus "select number". > > So I'm guessing the proposal is to freeze all the modules that Python > imports just to get itself running, which would consume no additional > memory when frozen, and saves time per your performance numbers, rather > than the whole stdlib, which is what is sort of implied by "all". > Yes, exactly. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140414/bda57acd/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] this is what happens if you freeze all the modules required for startup
- Next message: [Python-Dev] this is what happens if you freeze all the modules required for startup
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list