[Python-Dev] Software integrators vs end users (was Re: Language Summit notes)
Paul Moore
p.f.moore at gmail.com
Fri Apr 18 23:48:09 CEST 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Apr 18 23:48:09 CEST 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Software integrators vs end users (was Re: Language Summit notes)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Software integrators vs end users (was Re: Language Summit notes)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 18 April 2014 22:40, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > Perhaps we can get the "pip install ipython" experience to a good > place faster than I currently expect, and we can duck this entire > question (at least for Windows and Mac OS X). Huh? Last time I tried, it was pretty trivial. pip install pyzmq pyreadline tornado ipython (I might have missed a couple, as I did this from memory, not by looking at the website to check). There's nothing that needs a compiler apart from pyzmq and that has wheels for Windows these days, and builds out of the box with no dependencies in any case. The rest is all pure Python. I've not tried with 2.0, but I did try one of the betas and it was really that simple. (Windows 7 64-bit, Python 3.4 IIRC). And the 1.x versions were just as simple. Paul
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Software integrators vs end users (was Re: Language Summit notes)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Software integrators vs end users (was Re: Language Summit notes)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list