Antoine Pitrou antoine at python.org
Mon Aug 4 19:53:19 CEST 2014

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Surely "nullable" is a reasonable name?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Surely "nullable" is a reasonable name?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Le 04/08/2014 13:36, Alexander Belopolsky a écrit :
>
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us
> <mailto:ethan at stoneleaf.us>> wrote:
>
>     'allow_none' is definitely clearer.
>
>
> I disagree. Unlike "nullable", "allow_none" does not tell me what
> happens on the C side when I pass in None.  If the receiving type is
> PyObject*, either NULL or Py_None is a valid choice.

But here the receiving type can be an int.

Regards

Antoine.

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Surely "nullable" is a reasonable name?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Surely "nullable" is a reasonable name?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list