Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Sun Aug 17 10:28:17 CEST 2014

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 4000 to explicitly declare we won't be doing a Py3k style compatibility break again?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 4000 to explicitly declare we won't be doing a Py3k style compatibility break again?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On 17 August 2014 15:34, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 17 August 2014 15:08, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
>> I think this would be a great topic for a blog post. Once you've written it
>> I can even bless it by Tweeting about it. :-)
>
> Sounds like a plan - I'll try to put together something coherent this week :)

OK, make that "this afternoon":
http://www.curiousefficiency.org/posts/2014/08/python-4000.html :)

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 4000 to explicitly declare we won't be doing a Py3k style compatibility break again?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 4000 to explicitly declare we won't be doing a Py3k style compatibility break again?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list