[Python-Dev] Fwd: PEP 467: Minor API improvements for bytes & bytearray
Barry Warsaw
barry at python.org
Mon Aug 18 00:52:36 CEST 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Aug 18 00:52:36 CEST 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Fwd: PEP 467: Minor API improvements for bytes & bytearray
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Fwd: PEP 467: Minor API improvements for bytes & bytearray
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Aug 18, 2014, at 08:48 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >Calling it bytes is too confusing: > > for x in bytes(data): > ... > > for x in bytes(data).bytes() > >When referring to bytes, which bytes do you mean, the builtin or the method? > >iterbytes() isn't especially attractive as a method name, but it's far more >explicit about its purpose. I don't know. How often do you really instantiate the bytes object there in the for loop? -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140817/419e7a66/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Fwd: PEP 467: Minor API improvements for bytes & bytearray
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Fwd: PEP 467: Minor API improvements for bytes & bytearray
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list