[Python-Dev] Proposal: Update PEP 1 to allow an explicit "Provisional" status for PEPs
Ethan Furman
ethan at stoneleaf.us
Wed Dec 17 22:13:57 CET 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Dec 17 22:13:57 CET 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: Update PEP 1 to allow an explicit "Provisional" status for PEPs
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: Update PEP 1 to allow an explicit "Provisional" status for PEPs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 12/17/2014 12:57 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > If folks are OK with this idea, I'll go ahead and make the appropriate > changes to PEP 1 and the PEP index generator. I'm also happy to file a > tracker issue, or write a short PEP, if folks feel making such a > change requires a little more formality in its own right. We have provisional for modules, it would seem to also make sense for PEPs. A tracker issue would be good. -- ~Ethan~ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20141217/6a0040ba/attachment.sig>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: Update PEP 1 to allow an explicit "Provisional" status for PEPs
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: Update PEP 1 to allow an explicit "Provisional" status for PEPs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list