Larry Hastings larry at hastings.org
Tue Feb 4 10:55:12 CET 2014

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] The docstring hack for signature information has to go
• Next message: [Python-Dev] The docstring hack for signature information has to go
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On 02/03/2014 12:55 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> I think the solution adopted should be future-oriented (ie, clean in 
> the future) even if the cost is slight awkwardness in 3.3.

Just a minor point: I keep saying 3.3, but I kind of mean "3.2 through 
3.3".  I believe the binary ABI shipped with 3.2.  However, in practice 
I suspect there are few installations that

  * are still on 3.2, and
  * will ever use binary-ABI-clean third-party modules compiled against
    3.4+ that contain signatures.



//arry/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140204/7440bb84/attachment.html>

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] The docstring hack for signature information has to go
• Next message: [Python-Dev] The docstring hack for signature information has to go
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list