[Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 460: Add bytes % args and bytes.format(args) to Python 3.5
Xavier Morel
python-dev at masklinn.net
Mon Jan 6 15:50:17 CET 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Jan 6 15:50:17 CET 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 460: Add bytes % args and bytes.format(args) to Python 3.5
- Next message: [Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 460: Add bytes % args and bytes.format(args) to Python 3.5
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2014-01-06, at 14:44 , Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: >> Then, >> the following points must be decided to define the complete list of >> supported features (formatters): >> >> * Format integer to hexadecimal? ``%x`` and ``%X`` >> * Format integer to octal? ``%o`` >> * Format integer to binary? ``{!b}`` >> * Alignment? >> * Truncating? Truncate or raise an error? > > Not desirable IMHO. bytes formatting should serve mainly for templating > situations (i.e. catenate and insert bytestrings into one another). We > cannot start giving text-like semantics to bytes objects without > confusing non-experts. But having at least some of struct's formatting options available on bytes.format or bytes % would be useful.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 460: Add bytes % args and bytes.format(args) to Python 3.5
- Next message: [Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 460: Add bytes % args and bytes.format(args) to Python 3.5
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list