[Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 460: Add bytes % args and bytes.format(args) to Python 3.5
Antoine Pitrou
solipsis at pitrou.net
Mon Jan 6 16:08:01 CET 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Jan 6 16:08:01 CET 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 460: Add bytes % args and bytes.format(args) to Python 3.5
- Next message: [Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 460: Add bytes % args and bytes.format(args) to Python 3.5
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 7 Jan 2014 00:45:58 +1000 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > > Right, but it seems to me that a new helper module that could be made > backwards compatible at least as far as 2.6 (if not further) would be more > useful for that than a builtin change that won't be available until 2015. More useful in the short term, less useful in the long term. > An encodedstr type wouldn't implicitly interoperate with the builtins > (until we finally fix the sequence operand coercion bug in CPython) but > could at least handle formatting operations like this. That's a crude hack. Also it doesn't address the situation where you want to interpolate bytestrings without them having any textual significance. Regards Antoine.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 460: Add bytes % args and bytes.format(args) to Python 3.5
- Next message: [Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 460: Add bytes % args and bytes.format(args) to Python 3.5
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list