[Python-Dev] The desired behaviour for resolve() when the path doesn't exist
Serhiy Storchaka
storchaka at gmail.com
Tue Jan 7 21:45:54 CET 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Jan 7 21:45:54 CET 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] The desired behaviour for resolve() when the path doesn't exist
- Next message: [Python-Dev] The desired behaviour for resolve() when the path doesn't exist
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
07.01.14 22:28, Antoine Pitrou написав(ла): >> So perhaps two main modes should be --canonicalize (default) and >> --canonicalize-missing (with missing=True)? > > That sounds reasonable. And I think strict should be the default. --canonicalize is not strict. --canonicalize-existing is most strict and --canonicalize-missing is least strict. When you have a function which have non-strict behavior (--canonicalize), you can implement a wrapper with strict behavior (--canonicalize-existing), but not vice verse.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] The desired behaviour for resolve() when the path doesn't exist
- Next message: [Python-Dev] The desired behaviour for resolve() when the path doesn't exist
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list