[Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 460: Add bytes % args and bytes.format(args) to Python 3.5
Antoine Pitrou
solipsis at pitrou.net
Thu Jan 9 20:30:53 CET 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Jan 9 20:30:53 CET 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 460: Add bytes % args and bytes.format(args) to Python 3.5
- Next message: [Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 460: Add bytes % args and bytes.format(args) to Python 3.5
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 05:26:04 +1000 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > > We should probably include format_map for consistency with the str API. Yes, you're right. > >However, I > > also added bytearray into the mix, as bytearray objects should > > generally support the same operations as bytes (and they can be useful > > *especially* for network programming). > > So we'd define the *format* string as mutable to get a mutable result out > of the formatting operations? This seems a little weird to me. > > It also seems weird for a format method on a mutable type to *not* perform > in-place mutation. It's consistent with bytearray.join's behaviour: >>> x = bytearray() >>> x.join([b"abc"]) bytearray(b'abc') >>> x bytearray(b'') Regards Antoine.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 460: Add bytes % args and bytes.format(args) to Python 3.5
- Next message: [Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 460: Add bytes % args and bytes.format(args) to Python 3.5
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list