[Python-Dev] PEP 460: allowing %d and %f and mojibake
Kristján Valur Jónsson
kristjan at ccpgames.com
Sun Jan 12 03:11:23 CET 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sun Jan 12 03:11:23 CET 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 460: allowing %d and %f and mojibake
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 460: allowing %d and %f and mojibake
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
No, I don't think it is. The purpose is to make it easier to work with bytes objects. There can be no python 2 compatibility when it comes to bytes/unicode conversion. ________________________________________ From: Python-Dev [python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames.com at python.org] on behalf of Serhiy Storchaka [storchaka at gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2014 21:01 To: python-dev at python.org Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 460: allowing %d and %f and mojibake 11.01.14 21:40, Kristján Valur Jónsson написав(ла): > How about a compromise? > Personally, I think adding the full complement of integer/float formatting to bytes is a bit over the top. > How about just supporting two format specifiers? > %b : interpolate a bytes object. If it doesn't have the buffer interface, error. > %s : interpolate a str object, encoded to ASCII using 'strict' conversion. %b is not supported in Python 2.7. And compatibility with Python 2.7 is only the purpose of this feature.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 460: allowing %d and %f and mojibake
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 460: allowing %d and %f and mojibake
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list