[Python-Dev] PEP 461 Final?
Neil Schemenauer
nas at arctrix.com
Fri Jan 17 20:51:44 CET 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Jan 17 20:51:44 CET 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 461 Final?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 461 Final?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > Using %b could cause problems in the future as b is used in new style > formatting to mean output numbers in binary, so %B seems to me the > obvious choice as it's also unused. After updating my patch, I've decided that %s works better. My patch implements PEP 461 as proposed with the following additional features: - add %a format code, calls PyObject_ASCII on the argument. I see no reason not too add it as a useful debugging feature. - add -2 command-line option. When enabled: %s will fallback to calling PyObject_Str() after first trying the buffer API and __bytes__. The value will be encoded using strict ASCII encoding. Also, %r is enabled as an alias for %a. The patch is v4, bugs.python.org/issue20284, still needs more review and testing. Neil
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 461 Final?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 461 Final?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list