[Python-Dev] .clinic.c vs .c.clinic
Serhiy Storchaka
storchaka at gmail.com
Mon Jan 20 23:18:44 CET 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Jan 20 23:18:44 CET 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] .clinic.c vs .c.clinic
- Next message: [Python-Dev] .clinic.c vs .c.clinic
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
20.01.14 20:09, Georg Brandl написав(ла): > Am 20.01.2014 14:31, schrieb Serhiy Storchaka: >> 20.01.14 15:03, Nick Coghlan написав(ла): >>> On 20 January 2014 21:14, Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> 20.01.14 10:05, Larry Hastings написав(ла): >>>>> Contestant 4: "Put in clinic directory, add .h" >>>>> >>>>> foo.c -> clinic/foo.c.h >>>>> foo.h -> clinic/foo.h.h >>>> >>>> >>>> -1. (Generated files are located far from origins, directory name clutters >>>> the namespace of directory names). >>> >>> Larry's not talking about a top level directory here (at least I hope >>> he isn't). This proposal would mean using "Objects/clinic", >>> "Python/clinic", "Modules/clinic" as appropriate. >> >> This means the appearance of directories with the common name "clinic" >> in random places of the source tree. Some special name ("__clinic__", >> ".clinic") looks slightly less confusing to me. > > "clinic" shouldn't be such a common name in C soures :) Sources tree already has one "clinic" directory (Tools/clinic/).
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] .clinic.c vs .c.clinic
- Next message: [Python-Dev] .clinic.c vs .c.clinic
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list