[Python-Dev] lambda (x, y):
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Sat Jan 25 07:50:53 CET 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Jan 25 07:50:53 CET 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] lambda (x, y):
- Next message: [Python-Dev] lambda (x, y):
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 25 January 2014 15:41, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > Brett Cannon wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Ram Rachum <ram at rachum.com >> <mailto:ram at rachum.com>> wrote: >> >> lambda (x, y): whatever >> >> http://python.org/dev/peps/pep-3113/ > > > Part of the rationale in that PEP is that argument unpacking > can always be replaced by an explicitly named argument and > an unpacking assignment. No mention is made of the fact that > you can't do this in a lambda, giving the impression that > lambdas are deemed second-class citizens that are not worth > consideration. Given that lambdas only just escaped being removed entirely from the language in Python 3, that impression isn't wrong. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] lambda (x, y):
- Next message: [Python-Dev] lambda (x, y):
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list