[Python-Dev] Quick poll: should help() show bound arguments?
Ethan Furman
ethan at stoneleaf.us
Sun Jan 26 02:24:20 CET 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sun Jan 26 02:24:20 CET 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Quick poll: should help() show bound arguments?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Quick poll: should help() show bound arguments?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 01/25/2014 04:34 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org> wrote: >> >> What should it be? >> >> A) pydoc and help() should not show bound parameters in the signature, like >> inspect.signature. > > Vote for A. As far as I'm concerned, all these foo are equally > callable and equally take one parameter named a: [snip] To strengthen this argument: --> import inspect --> from functools import partial --> def lots_of_args(a, b, c, d=3, e='wow', f=None): ... print(a, b, c, d, e, f) ... --> str(inspect.signature(lots_of_args)) "(a, b, c, d=3, e='wow', f=None)" --> curried = partial(lots_of_args, 9, f='Some') --> str(inspect.signature(curried)) "(b, c, d=3, e='wow', f='Some')" While I partially agree with Antoine that the whole self thing is confusing, I think it would be more accurate to only give help (and a signature) on parameters that you can actually change; if you are calling a bound method there is no way to pass in something else in place of self. So I vote for A. -- ~Ethan~
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Quick poll: should help() show bound arguments?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Quick poll: should help() show bound arguments?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list