[Python-Dev] Negative times behaviour in itertools.repeat for Python maintenance releases (2.7, 3.3 and maybe 3.4)
Ethan Furman
ethan at stoneleaf.us
Tue Jan 28 15:18:23 CET 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Jan 28 15:18:23 CET 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Negative times behaviour in itertools.repeat for Python maintenance releases (2.7, 3.3 and maybe 3.4)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Negative times behaviour in itertools.repeat for Python maintenance releases (2.7, 3.3 and maybe 3.4)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 01/28/2014 04:37 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:06:57PM -0800, Larry Hastings wrote: > >> If I were writing it, it might well come out like this: > [snip example] > > +1 on this wording, with one minor caveat: > >> .. note: if "times" is specified using a keyword argument, and >> provided with a negative value, repeat yields the object forever. >> This is a bug, its use is unsupported, and this behavior may be >> removed in a future version of Python. > > How about changing "may be removed" to "will be removed", he asks > hopefully? :-) +1 -- ~Ethan~
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Negative times behaviour in itertools.repeat for Python maintenance releases (2.7, 3.3 and maybe 3.4)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Negative times behaviour in itertools.repeat for Python maintenance releases (2.7, 3.3 and maybe 3.4)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list