[Python-Dev] Negative times behaviour in itertools.repeat for Python maintenance releases (2.7, 3.3 and maybe 3.4)
Armin Rigo
arigo at tunes.org
Tue Jan 28 21:35:32 CET 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Jan 28 21:35:32 CET 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Negative times behaviour in itertools.repeat for Python maintenance releases (2.7, 3.3 and maybe 3.4)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] The Argument Clinic Derby is drawing to a close
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Vajrasky, On 28 January 2014 03:05, Vajrasky Kok <sky.kok at speaklikeaking.com> wrote: > I get your point. But strangely enough, I can still recover from > list(repeat('a', 2**29)). It only slows down my computer. I can ^Z the > application then kill it later. But with list(repeat('a', times=-1)), > rebooting the machine is compulsory. Actually you get the early OverflowError if the value doesn't fit a C long, and any value up to sys.maxint gets past this check. Try with 2**31-1. A bientôt, Armin.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Negative times behaviour in itertools.repeat for Python maintenance releases (2.7, 3.3 and maybe 3.4)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] The Argument Clinic Derby is drawing to a close
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list