[Python-Dev] My summary of the scandir (PEP 471)
Ben Hoyt
benhoyt at gmail.com
Tue Jul 1 17:30:37 CEST 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Jul 1 17:30:37 CEST 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] My summary of the scandir (PEP 471)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] My summary of the scandir (PEP 471)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> No need for a microsecond-timed deletion -- a directory with +r but > without +x will allow you to list the entries, but stat calls on the > files will fail with EPERM: Ah -- very good to know, thanks. This definitely points me in the direction of wanting better control over error handling. Speaking of errors, and thinking of handling errors during iteration -- in what cases (if any) would an individual readdir fail if the opendir succeeded? -Ben
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] My summary of the scandir (PEP 471)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] My summary of the scandir (PEP 471)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list