[Python-Dev] Updates to PEP 471, the os.scandir() proposal
Victor Stinner
victor.stinner at gmail.com
Wed Jul 9 23:38:26 CEST 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Jul 9 23:38:26 CEST 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Updates to PEP 471, the os.scandir() proposal
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Updates to PEP 471, the os.scandir() proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2014-07-09 22:44 GMT+02:00 Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us>: > On 07/09/2014 01:24 PM, Victor Stinner wrote: >> Sorry, I didn't follow the whole discussion. IMO DirEntry must use >> methods and you should not expose nor document which infos are already >> provided by the OS or not. DirEntry should be a best-effort black-box >> object providing an API similar to pathlib.Path. is_dir() may be fast? >> fine, but don't say it in the documentation because Python must remain >> portable and you should not write code specific to one specific >> platform. > > > Okay, so using that logic we should head over to the os module and remove: (...) My comment was specific to the PEP 471, design of the DirEntry class. Victor
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Updates to PEP 471, the os.scandir() proposal
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Updates to PEP 471, the os.scandir() proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list