[Python-Dev] Updates to PEP 471, the os.scandir() proposal
Ethan Furman
ethan at stoneleaf.us
Thu Jul 10 19:53:45 CEST 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Jul 10 19:53:45 CEST 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Updates to PEP 471, the os.scandir() proposal
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Updates to PEP 471, the os.scandir() proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 07/10/2014 06:58 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > The info we want for scandir is that of the *link itself*. That makes it > easy to implement things like the "followlinks" flag of os.walk. The > *far end* of the link isn't relevant at this level. This also mirrors listdir, correct? scandir is simply* returning something smarter than a string. > The docs just need to be clear that DirEntry objects always match lstat(), never stat(). Agreed. -- ~Ethan~ * As well as being a less resource-intensive generator. :)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Updates to PEP 471, the os.scandir() proposal
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Updates to PEP 471, the os.scandir() proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list