[Python-Dev] Remaining decisions on PEP 471 -- os.scandir()
Ethan Furman
ethan at stoneleaf.us
Mon Jul 14 06:52:37 CEST 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Jul 14 06:52:37 CEST 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Remaining decisions on PEP 471 -- os.scandir()
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Remaining decisions on PEP 471 -- os.scandir()
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 07/13/2014 05:33 PM, Ben Hoyt wrote: > > On the recent python-dev thread, Victor especially made some well > thought out suggestions. It seems to me there's general agreement that > the basic API in PEP 471 is good (with Ethan not a fan at first, but > it seems he's on board after further discussion :-). I would still like to have 'info' and 'onerror' added to the basic API, but I agree that having methods and caching on first lookup is good. > That said, I think there's basically one thing remaining to decide: > whether or not to have DirEntry.is_dir() and .is_file() follow > symlinks by default. We should have a flag for that, and default it to False: scandir(path, *, followlinks=False, info=None, onerror=None) -- ~Ethan~
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Remaining decisions on PEP 471 -- os.scandir()
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Remaining decisions on PEP 471 -- os.scandir()
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list