[Python-Dev] Internal representation of strings and Micropython
Jeff Allen
ja.py at farowl.co.uk
Wed Jun 4 09:41:12 CEST 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Jun 4 09:41:12 CEST 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Internal representation of strings and Micropython
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Internal representation of strings and Micropython
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jython uses UTF-16 internally -- probably the only sensible choice in a Python that can call Java. Indexing is O(N), fundamentally. By "fundamentally", I mean for those strings that have not yet noticed that they contain no supplementary (>0xffff) characters. I've toyed with making this O(1) universally. Like Steven, I understand this to be a freedom afforded to implementers, rather than an issue of conformity. Jeff Allen On 04/06/2014 02:17, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > There is a discussion over at MicroPython about the internal > representation of Unicode strings. ... > My own feeling is that O(1) string indexing operations are a quality of > implementation issue, not a deal breaker to call it a Python. I can't > see any requirement in the docs that str[n] must take O(1) time, but > perhaps I have missed something. >
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Internal representation of strings and Micropython
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Internal representation of strings and Micropython
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list