[Python-Dev] Internal representation of strings and Micropython
Serhiy Storchaka
storchaka at gmail.com
Thu Jun 5 10:08:21 CEST 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Jun 5 10:08:21 CEST 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Internal representation of strings and Micropython
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Internal representation of strings and Micropython
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
05.06.14 05:25, Terry Reedy написав(ла): > I mentioned it as an alternative during the '393 discussion. I more than > half agree that the FSR is the better choice for CPython, which had no > particular attachment to UTF-16 in the way that I think Jython, for > instance, does. Yes, I remember. I thing that hybrid FSR-UTF16 (like FSR, but UTF-16 is used instead of UCS4) is the better choice for CPython. I suppose that with populating emoticons and other icon characters in nearest 5 or 10 years, even English text will often contain astral characters. And spending 4 bytes per character if long text contains one astral character looks too prodigally.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Internal representation of strings and Micropython
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Internal representation of strings and Micropython
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list