[Python-Dev] Internal representation of strings and Micropython
Stefan Krah
stefan at bytereef.org
Thu Jun 5 14:10:54 CEST 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Jun 5 14:10:54 CEST 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Internal representation of strings and Micropython
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Internal representation of strings and Micropython
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Paul Sokolovsky <pmiscml at gmail.com> wrote: > In this regard, I'm glad to participate in mind-resetting discussion. > So, let's reiterate - there's nothing like "the best", "the only right", > "the only correct", "righter than", "more correct than" in CPython's > implementation of Unicode storage. It is *arbitrary*. Well, sure, it's > not arbitrary, but based on requirements, and these requirements match > CPython's (implied) usage model well enough. But among all possible > sets of requirements, CPython's requirements are no more valid that > other possible. And other set of requirement fairly clearly lead to > situation where CPython implementation is rejected as not correct for > those requirements at all. Several core-devs have said that using UTF-8 for MicroPython is perfectly okay. I also think it's the right choice and I hope that you guys come up with a very efficient implementation. Stefan Krah
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Internal representation of strings and Micropython
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Internal representation of strings and Micropython
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list