[Python-Dev] [numpy wishlist] Interpreter support for temporary elision in third-party classes
Greg Ewing
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Sat Jun 7 02:37:14 CEST 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Jun 7 02:37:14 CEST 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [numpy wishlist] Interpreter support for temporary elision in third-party classes
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [numpy wishlist] Interpreter support for temporary elision in third-party classes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Julian Taylor wrote: > tp_can_elide receives two objects and returns one of three values: > * can work inplace, operation is associative > * can work inplace but not associative > * cannot work inplace Does it really need to be that complicated? Isn't it sufficient just to ask the object potentially being overwritten whether it's okay to overwrite it? I.e. a parameterless method returning a boolean. -- Greg
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [numpy wishlist] Interpreter support for temporary elision in third-party classes
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [numpy wishlist] Interpreter support for temporary elision in third-party classes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list