[Python-Dev] PEP 471 -- os.scandir() function -- a better and faster directory iterator
MRAB
python at mrabarnett.plus.com
Fri Jun 27 03:50:38 CEST 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Jun 27 03:50:38 CEST 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 471 -- os.scandir() function -- a better and faster directory iterator
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 471 -- os.scandir() function -- a better and faster directory iterator
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2014-06-27 02:37, Ben Hoyt wrote: > I don't mind iterdir() and would take it :-), but I'll just say why I > chose the name scandir() -- though it wasn't my suggestion originally: > > iterdir() sounds like just an iterator version of listdir(), kinda > like keys() and iterkeys() in Python 2. Whereas in actual fact the > return values are quite different (DirEntry objects vs strings), and > so the name change reflects that difference a little. > [snip] The re module has 'findall', which returns a list of strings, and 'finditer', which returns an iterator that yields match objects, so there's a precedent. :-)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 471 -- os.scandir() function -- a better and faster directory iterator
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 471 -- os.scandir() function -- a better and faster directory iterator
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list