[Python-Dev] Poll: Py_REPLACE/Py_ASSIGN/etc
emm.odeke at gmail.com
emm.odeke at gmail.com
Sat Mar 1 02:03:24 CET 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Mar 1 02:03:24 CET 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3.4150
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Poll: Py_REPLACE/Py_ASSIGN/etc
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Koodo network. Original Message From: Barry Warsaw Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 3:50 PM To: python-dev at python.org Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Poll: Py_REPLACE/Py_ASSIGN/etc On Mar 01, 2014, at 08:15 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >It *is* playing refcounting games - it's decrefing the existing target >while stealing a reference to the new target, just like the existing >SET_ITEM macros and somewhat like Py_CLEAR (although in that case, it's >more obvious that we will never incref NULL). Okay, but "setting the reference" isn't one of them, which is what I read when I see Py_SETREF. ;) >The whole point of this macro is to take an *existing* reference and safely >*overwrite* another existing reference, exactly as the SET_ITEM macros do. > >That actually gives me an idea that wasn't on Serhiy's original list: >Py_SET_ATTR(target, value). That does seem better. -Barry
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3.4150
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Poll: Py_REPLACE/Py_ASSIGN/etc
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list