[Python-Dev] What is the precise problem? [was: Reference cycles in Exception.__traceback__]
Maciej Fijalkowski
fijall at gmail.com
Mon Mar 10 18:30:20 CET 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Mar 10 18:30:20 CET 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] What is the precise problem? [was: Reference cycles in Exception.__traceback__]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] What is the precise problem? [was: Reference cycles in Exception.__traceback__]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote: > 2014-03-10 13:11 GMT+01:00 Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall at gmail.com>: >> It was agreed long time ago that the immediate finalization is an >> implementation specific detail and it's not guaranteed. You should not >> rely on __del__s being called timely one way or another. Why would you >> require this for the program to work correctly in the particular >> example of __traceback__? > > For asyncio, it's very useful to see unhandled exceptions as early as > possible. Otherwise, your program is blocked and you don't know why. > > Guido van Rossum suggests to run gc.collect() regulary: > http://code.google.com/p/tulip/issues/detail?id=42 > > Victor twisted goes around it by attaching errback by hand. Would that work for tulip?
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] What is the precise problem? [was: Reference cycles in Exception.__traceback__]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] What is the precise problem? [was: Reference cycles in Exception.__traceback__]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list