[Python-Dev] Status of PEP 3145
[Python-Dev] Status of PEP 3145 - Asynchronous I/O for subprocess.popen
Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.netWed Mar 26 00:24:56 CET 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Status of PEP 3145 - Asynchronous I/O for subprocess.popen
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Status of PEP 3145 - Asynchronous I/O for subprocess.popen
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 16:14:04 -0700 Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > That would be a rather strong unilateral decision. Why don't you ask the > authors? In theory the PEP's proposals could serve in situations where > asyncio isn't appropriate, and asyncio's subprocess I/O isn't the smoothest > API imaginable. (In practice I'm not sure if the PEP would have been > written with asyncio subprocess support in place.) That's a good point. I now have e-mailed Eric Pruitt and Josiah Carlson (I couldn't find an e-mail for Charles R. McCreary). Regards Antoine.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Status of PEP 3145 - Asynchronous I/O for subprocess.popen
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Status of PEP 3145 - Asynchronous I/O for subprocess.popen
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list