[Python-Dev] On the necessity of PEPs [was "collections.sortedtree"]
Ethan Furman
ethan at stoneleaf.us
Thu Mar 27 03:27:51 CET 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Mar 27 03:27:51 CET 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] On the necessity of PEPs [was "collections.sortedtree"]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] On the necessity of PEPs [was "collections.sortedtree"]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 03/26/2014 07:11 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote: >> >> I'm not sure if that's a good thing or not. > > YMMV but IMHO this is a good thing. PEPs provide a single point of reference to a discussion that would otherwise be > spread over multiple centi-threads (not that PEPs don't create centi-threads, but they outlive them in a way). Plus the PEP can help prevent multiple mega-threads as the same idea is revisited again and again and again... -- ~Ethan~
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] On the necessity of PEPs [was "collections.sortedtree"]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] On the necessity of PEPs [was "collections.sortedtree"]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list