[Python-Dev] collections.sortedtree
Chris Angelico
rosuav at gmail.com
Thu Mar 27 12:14:17 CET 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Mar 27 12:14:17 CET 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] collections.sortedtree
- Next message: [Python-Dev] collections.sortedtree
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > Extending our trust to include a new component isn't to be done > lightly, but it *does* genuinely save work in the long run for a whole > lot of other people whenever we choose to do so, and that is the point > Stephen was making. Exactly so. Blessing a module as part of the stdlib is an important mark of trust, and one that is most definitely not stupid to respect. (In case my previous message was ambiguous, I am fully in favour of people trusting python.org in this way, and fully understanding of people NOT trusting other sources, or at least not automatically.) ChrisA
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] collections.sortedtree
- Next message: [Python-Dev] collections.sortedtree
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list