Terry Reedy tjreedy at udel.edu
Sun Mar 30 03:35:02 CEST 2014

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 461: Adding % formatting to bytes and bytearray -- Final, Take 3
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 461: Adding % formatting to bytes and bytearray -- Final, Take 3
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On 3/29/2014 8:28 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:

> The "future" project already contains a full backport of a true bytes
> type, rather than relying on Python 2 str objects:
> http://python-future.org/what_else.html#bytes

That project looks really nice!

> It seems to me that the easiest way to make any forthcoming Python 3.5
> enhancements (both binary interpolation and the other cleanups we are
> discussing over on Python ideas) available to single source 2/3 code
> bases is to commit to an API freeze for *those particular builtins*
> early, and then update "future" accordingly.

I agree. I think syntax changes should be in by the first alpha, if not 
before.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 461: Adding % formatting to bytes and bytearray -- Final, Take 3
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 461: Adding % formatting to bytes and bytearray -- Final, Take 3
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list