[Python-Dev] Making proxy types easier to write and maintain
Eric Snow
ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com
Mon Mar 31 20:41:40 CEST 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Mar 31 20:41:40 CEST 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Making proxy types easier to write and maintain
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Making proxy types easier to write and maintain
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org> wrote: > On 03/20/2014 12:49 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > So long as Graham's willing to go along with it, he doesn't have to to > be the one to write the PEP. > > > PEP? Why does it need a PEP? I didn't think it'd even be a new top-level > library module, it'd be an addition / additions to functools. Would it make sense to have a new module named classtools rather than add more class-related stuff to functools. For instance, total_ordering() is the sort of thing I would expect to find in classtools rather than functools. -eric
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Making proxy types easier to write and maintain
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Making proxy types easier to write and maintain
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list