Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettinger at gmail.com
Mon Mar 31 21:51:39 CEST 2014

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Treating tokenize.Untokenizer as private
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Feb 18, 2014, at 1:09 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote:

> While the function could be implemented as one 70-line function, it happens to be implemented as a 4-line wrapper for a completely undocumented (Untokenizer class with 4 methods. (It is unmentioned in the doc and there are currently no docstrings.)
> 
> I view the class as a private implementation detail and would like to treat it as such, and perhaps even rename it _Untokenizer to make that clear.

Yes, that would be reasonable.


Raymond
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140331/ebe73de9/attachment.html>

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Treating tokenize.Untokenizer as private
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list