[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Remove the redundant and poorly worded warning message.
Raymond Hettinger
raymond.hettinger at gmail.com
Sun May 11 01:47:30 CEST 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sun May 11 01:47:30 CEST 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Remove the redundant and poorly worded warning message.
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Remove the redundant and poorly worded warning message.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On May 10, 2014, at 4:15 PM, Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml at behnel.de> wrote: > Total +1 on keeping these little bits around. Since all of you want a warning, I'll add one back but with improved wording. I'm not all at comfortable with the wording of the second sentence. I was the author of the SystemRandom() class and I only want to guarantee that it provides access to the operating system's source of random numbers. It is a bold claim to guarantee that it is cryptographically secure (many such claims in the past have turned-out to be false). We don't really know what it is going to do on a VM for example. Also, I don't want to call SystemRandom() a pseudo-random number generator. It purports to be an actual random number generator (or at least it purports to have used some real source of entropy at some stage). To me (the module maintainer), that is an important distinction. Raymond -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140510/321007ee/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Remove the redundant and poorly worded warning message.
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Remove the redundant and poorly worded warning message.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list