[Python-Dev] Where is our official policy of what platforms we do support?
Antoine Pitrou
solipsis at pitrou.net
Thu May 15 19:14:55 CEST 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu May 15 19:14:55 CEST 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Where is our official policy of what platforms we do support?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Where is our official policy of what platforms we do support?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 15 May 2014 09:40:33 -0500 Skip Montanaro <skip at pobox.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Brett Cannon <bcannon at gmail.com> wrote: > > I view stable buildbots as staying up and testing critical platforms. > > Would "supported" and "unsupported" (or "critical" and "optional"?) > make more sense? "Unstable" suggests "broken" to me, not "we don't > really care about these." I don't know who came up with these names in the first place. However there's a slight nuance here: some platform may be supported, but still some buildbot end up in the "unstable" category if it has issues of its own (for example the machine has a flaky network connection, etc.). And indeed there are Linux and Windows machines in the "unstable" category. Regards Antoine.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Where is our official policy of what platforms we do support?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Where is our official policy of what platforms we do support?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list